7 comments

  • ceejayoz 10 days ago
    He was also arrested yesterday trying to flee via plane because he was dumb enough to bring a gun through TSA. https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/education/k-12-schools/er...

    Heaven help us when someone with half a brain tries the same stunt.

    • 0x1ch 10 days ago
      Pre-checking them and bringing them through TSA properly secured is fine.
      • hollywood_court 10 days ago
        No. You don't take firearms through TSA checkpoints. You check them at the baggage counter. And then pray they don't get stolen. Although I've only had firearms stolen when flying through SJU.
        • gruez 10 days ago
          > You check them at the baggage counter. And then pray they don't get stolen.

          I've heard of people traveling with expensive camera gear putting a starter pistol with their checked luggage, because if you declared a baggage as having a gun they can't open it without you being present. Of course this won't deter a sufficiently motivated thief, but it does prevent someone with sticky fingers swiping your stuff during a "random inspection".

      • ceejayoz 10 days ago
        "Darien was stopped for having a gun on him"

        The other details of the case - Googling how to do it on school computers, being the original source of the video, being under investigation for stealing from the school by the victim - don't exactly scream "criminal mastermind".

      • Freedom2 10 days ago
        > You may transport unloaded firearms in a locked hard-sided container as checked baggage only. Declare the firearm and/or ammunition to the airline when checking your bag at the ticket counter.

        From: https://www.tsa.gov/travel/transporting-firearms-and-ammunit...

        Could you elaborate on what you mean by bringing them through TSA?

  • christophilus 10 days ago
    I think the real news is the way he was condemned by the media before the audio had been properly analyzed. Guilty until proven innocent seems to be the way these days.
    • ceejayoz 10 days ago
      They look to have been pretty reasonable in the coverage.

      https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/baltimore-co-schools-...

      Alleged, "speculation that the recording was generated using AI", "we need more information", etc.

      • hodgesrm 10 days ago
        Thanks! That's a very balanced article. The reporter dug for information.
        • ceejayoz 10 days ago
          Yeah, and the original article from two weeks earlier (linked in an early paragraph) was similarly cautious; "may be fake" in the headline, "WJZ is choosing not to publish the recording at this time because we are unable to verify the authenticity of it...", etc.

          They can't really just ignore such a story, but they certainly seem to have had their spidey sense up about this one.

    • mandibeet 10 days ago
      > Guilty until proven innocent seems to be the way these days.

      Sometimes it can be obvious

    • mvdtnz 10 days ago
      More like condemned by the mob. These mobs of well-meaning but uninformed people never seem to learn any lessons.
      • VoodooJuJu 10 days ago
        What lesson is there to learn? Social justice mobs face no downsides. If they're never punished, where's the lesson?
        • ceejayoz 10 days ago
          What punishment would you inflict for "getting mad online"?

          The perpetrator and instigator of the problem has been caught and is highly likely to be punished for it.

        • mvdtnz 10 days ago
          I would hope a lesson might be "we negatively impacted this man and we did so without knowing all the facts, we should do better next time". I'm idealistic.
          • quickslowdown 10 days ago
            "If there's one thing to learn from all of human history, it's that we've never learned a single goddamn thing from all of human history." - Robert Evans, a podcaster (Behind the Bastards)
          • Kye 10 days ago
            It's a timeless tradition that transcends time and culture. Probably not going away any time soon. At least these mobs are mostly non-violent.
  • chrisco255 10 days ago
    Will we reach a point in the not too distant future where we will legitimately not be able to tell that a video is AI generated? Or do you think there will always be markers?
    • tromp 10 days ago
      I fear the cost of telling the difference is going to increase substantially.
  • ChrisArchitect 10 days ago
  • ColinWright 10 days ago
  • alephnerd 10 days ago
    There goes internet anonymity...