Do you ever find yourself using that word in real life too? You're the first person I've seen to use it non-ironically. I will use it from now on, I quite like it.
I notice on almost all of these image transformation projects the example images provided are usually very low res. It's basically impossible to judge how well this really works with the thumbnail sized images on the github page.
Visual artifacts are often visible only at higher resolutions. Take the first photo, as an example: wouldn't you be curious to see how the road looks at a higher resolution? From the thumbnail - it might as well be horrible/ unusable. Same thing about the clouds.
Wow, I had no idea about this. I've used it on software before since it looks well-suited to software, and I suspect others are in the same boat. Thanks for mentioning this!
https://github.com/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle
Content: "https://github.com/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle."
Stylized Content: "https//githubcom/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle"
So friggin' close to realism! Damn ...
https://creativecommons.org/faq/
"The only categories of works for which CC does not recommend its licenses are computer software and hardware."
(although they seem to have taken on the FAQ section talking about this in more detail)