So they started a proceeding to close down my company, using a law evidently only established for closing companies due to bankruptcy. In order to stop this process, according to the governmental agency, I have to:
1. give them the data (done)
2. pay fee for misunderstanding their site and not giving them the data earlier (done)
3. get an accountant to write a detailed report as to why I am not bankrupt and pay an extra fee for them to accept this report (required by bankruptcy law not pertinent to my case)
I'm trying to appeal against step 3 as being way too much. And as part of my case I would like to have guidelines as to how often UX analysis of sites should be done because
a.) I believe this problem with their site has existed for a while
b.) the caseworkers dealing with my case immediately understood the mistaken assumption I had made when talking about it over the phone, leading me to assume it is something they all know sucks about their site but according to them it was just the way it was and nothing was going to be done. So I think it might turn out there actually hasn't been any UX analysis of the site and its usage or any recommendations to fix things for the last few years, because governmental work - our clients have to use us!
1 comments