Interesting that vanilla and cocoa cone from the americas but are primarily produced elsewhere (mostly Africa (c) and Asia (v))
Vanilla is more subtle and less overpowering. Chocolate is “decadent”. It’s good on occasion, but too much too often and it over satiates whereas vanilla can keep on going, less filling, more aromatic, more nuanced, more delicate.
My local Amish community has an annual fundraising auction day thing for their school. Dunno what the ice cream they make would be branded, but THAT STUFF.
There's no substitute for real, unsanitary, dairy. There's just good reasons not to do a lot of it, like crack.
The final paragraphs of the article launch unexpectedly into a cursory attack on a Friends Of Earth campaign which is centered on the GMO aspect of new vanillin synthesis and the marketting of GMO products as natural. The author takes the opportunity to characterise FOEs position roughly without mentioning GMOs at all, introducing it as "downright dumb".
Friends of the Earth are quite fanatical about actual natural food and conditions, whether that be a good or bad approach in these times. National geographic under ownership of the Murdochs seems free to pick and omit information for its advertisers fanaticisms.
That is a valid argument, but FOE campaining doesnt just mention GM - it centers itself on it. Omitting that is CLEARLY not valid reporting of their campaign, its partial gossip.
Vanilla is more subtle and less overpowering. Chocolate is “decadent”. It’s good on occasion, but too much too often and it over satiates whereas vanilla can keep on going, less filling, more aromatic, more nuanced, more delicate.
There's no substitute for real, unsanitary, dairy. There's just good reasons not to do a lot of it, like crack.
Friends of the Earth are quite fanatical about actual natural food and conditions, whether that be a good or bad approach in these times. National geographic under ownership of the Murdochs seems free to pick and omit information for its advertisers fanaticisms.