Nicely done, you have normalized population data! Would you mind defaulting to displaying your cases normalized by population though for the choropleth? Counties aren't uniform, and so you get wildly confusing results from showing absolute data ([1] has a great set of examples).
For sure! Often times the COVID19 choropleths often look like population maps due to lack of normalization. We added the normalization map to try and address this. Will change the default then. Thanks for the feedback.
The data available for Colorado also includes the number of tests performed, and number of cases requiring hospitalization. If that information is uniformly available, you might consider incorporating it.
The open source bioinformatics community is having a massive hackathon this week (400+ participants). Might you be able to join the effort and post a link to this project on the wiki [1] or in our Slack discussion?
You may find many other folks interested in collaborating!
It is valid for me as well, but I have heard of certification errors from people I have sent it to. We have the SSL certificate and we are using https. Any suggestions on how we would go about fixing this?
[1] https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/product/mapping/ma...
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/11ulhC5FwnRhiKqxDl6_9...
https://www.nzz.ch/panorama/die-wichtigsten-grafiken-zum-cor...
It could be helpful to see that with state level data.
The open source bioinformatics community is having a massive hackathon this week (400+ participants). Might you be able to join the effort and post a link to this project on the wiki [1] or in our Slack discussion?
You may find many other folks interested in collaborating!
[1] https://github.com/virtual-biohackathons/covid-19-bh20/wiki