Bob Dole has died

(wsj.com)

78 points | by stopagephobia 866 days ago

11 comments

  • hirundo 866 days ago
    "As a 21-year-old platoon leader, Dole was trying to pull a radioman from the line of fire when he was struck in the upper back and right arm...It took three years of treatment and countless setbacks before he was able to recover from the wounds, although he lost the use of his right arm and most of the feeling in his left."

    Thank you for your military service Senator. Rest in peace.

    • GoodJokes 866 days ago
      Simping the military is one of silicon valley’s longest traditions!
  • kwertyoowiyop 866 days ago
    Like John McCain, Dole’s politics did not agree with mine but he went through some serious sh*t serving our country, so a heartfelt “thank you.”
    • GoodJokes 866 days ago
      When serving your country means participating in imperialist war and murder, I think it is ok to uh not thank them. McCain VOLUNTEERED to bomb a bunch of g*ks in his own wonderful words.
    • hereforphone 866 days ago
      So much better and mature than the typical Reddit comment when a conservative dies. Hopefully HN doesn't degenerate too fast, the maturity level is what keeps me here.
      • shmoe 866 days ago
        Depends on the conservative, but McCain, Dole -- those guys are American legends and deserve respect regardless of their politics.
        • Teever 866 days ago
          how do you think Vietnamese people should feel about McCain and Dole?
          • _moof 865 days ago
            Dole fought in World War II.
            • Teever 865 days ago
              You're right I missed that, but I think it makes my point better. I was replying to a comment that said "Those guys are American legends and deserve respect regardless of their politics."

              I dispute that.

              I'm not American. These guys may be American legends but that doesn't mean that they deserve my respect.

              There are a lot of legitimate gripes that people around the world can have about someone like McCain and Dole and they don't implicitly deserve respect because they're dead.

              • shmoe 865 days ago
                If you read the article below, it would seem there was fairly good sentiment from Vietnam as well when McCain passed.
          • jannie123 866 days ago
            For McCain they view him fairly well (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2018/08/27/how-vietnam-...) and idk for Dole but I'd be surprised if they knew him (he didn't fight in vietnam btw if that's what your implying)
          • hereforphone 865 days ago
            See what I mean about Reddit-like?
  • goldcd 866 days ago
    “I do not need the presidency to make or refresh my soul. For greatness lies not in what office you hold, but on how honest you are in how you face adversity and in your willingness to stand fast in hard places.”

    That's not a bad quote

    Actually, whole obituary is worth a read - https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/05/bob-dole-sol...

    This is a left wing British paper.

  • bradleyjg 866 days ago
    I always wonder if the Republicans nominated him in 1996 because they thought he could win or just as honorary thing given they probably couldn’t win with anyone.

    It felt like one of the most lopsided elections of my lifetime (I was too young to pay attention to politics when Dukakis ran.)

    • Lazare 866 days ago
      Parties (generally, at least in the modern era) can only nominate people who run, and people run based on their estimation of the odds, the competition, and their estimation of their ability to wait until the next cycle.

      Somewhat famously, in the 1992 cycle the Democrats were going up against an incumbent president who had just overseen a successful war, and was enjoying 89%(!) approval ratings. Some of the highest profile candidates (such as Mario Cuomo) sat it out, leaving the field to minor players including the then little-known governor of Arkansas, Bill Clinton. In the event, Bush crumbled and Clinton won, in large part due to a very brief recession. July 1990 marked the end of the longest peacetime expansion in US history, and by March 1991 the recession officially ended...but when voters went to the polls in 1992, they still punished the incumbent.

      (I'm just old enough to remember a political joke from back then. It went something like: President Bush is walking along a beach when he finds an old lamp. He picks it up, rubs it, and a genie comes out and grants him three wishes. Bush asks for the Persian Gulf conflict to be a smashing success, the economy to recover, and some other policy success I can't quite recall after all these years. The genie agrees and vanishes. One of his advisors looks worried. "Are you sure you shouldn't have wished to win the election?" Bush confidently replies "Are you kidding? After all those successes, how could I lose?")

      1996 was, again, a race against an incumbent, but consider: Clinton was vastly less popular than Bush had been, and he had some obvious weaknesses as a candidate. It was by no means absurd to think a respected, straight shooting war hero could come out ahead against the tarnished, draft dodging Bill Clinton. And of course, as with 1992, there was every chance that by the time people went to vote, the situation might look very different.

      So...I think Dole (and the many others who competed for the nomination) did so because they thought they could win, and they weren't wrong. The immediately prior election was proof of that! That being said, it was always going to be a challenge, and I think some strong candidates did decide to wait for the hopefully friendlier 2020 cycle. On the other hand, Dole was running out of time. So was Dole running because he thought he could win, or because he thought this was his last chance? Both, probably. And then he was nominated as the strongest candidate running. (It's not like a party is ever going to survey the field and decide just not to contest a presidential election, regardless of the odds.)

    • CommieBobDole 866 days ago
      I don't think it was as lopsided as you think - Dole got 40.7% of the popular vote compared to Clinton's 49.7%, and he flipped five states in the electoral college.

      Even though the results were never really in doubt, that's not too bad of a showing against an incumbent president.

      • sverhagen 865 days ago
        With the two parties' loyal voters locked in already, and these races pretty much being about the swing voters in the middle, this sounds like a landslide, in American politics.
        • tharne 865 days ago
          It would be a landslide by today's standards, but those kinds of margins were pretty common in the 80's and 90's. You had a lot more swing voters and people who would split their tickets so you had bigger margins while also having less certainly about the outcome prior to the actual vote. People forget that in the 80's and 90's a democrat could win West Virginia and Kentucky and a republican could win places like California and New York.
          • bradleyjg 865 days ago
            Even back then, that was a very healthy margin of victory. Reagan beat Carter by not much more than that.
    • runevault 866 days ago
      I wouldn't be surprised if the latter. I don't know that the Rs had anyone who could compete with Clinton on charisma which is always dangerous. Hell when Bush Sr ran he didn't realize what he was going up against until it was too late.
      • rootusrootus 866 days ago
        > when Bush Sr ran he didn't realize what he was going up against until it was too late

        I still remember watching that moment in the town hall when it hit me that he was going to win, and probably by a good margin. He was smooooth.

        Coincidentally, I also remember watching Hillary Clinton do the dance thing during a debate with Trump and that's the moment I decided she might actually lose despite everyone suggesting it was going to be a blowout. Told my wife "If she loses, it will be because of that attitude." She definitely does not have Bill's charisma.

        • runevault 865 days ago
          As someone who grew up in Arkansas, even as a kid we all knew the rest of the country had no idea what was coming. A Democrat who managed to win the governorship in Arkansas is, uh, impressive.
    • hereforphone 866 days ago
      I'd guess inside politics + no one obviously better to run at the time. IMO the same reason Hillary was put up ("her turn" + who else?)
    • Jansen312 866 days ago
      Hard to say. Considering that Biden got way more votes than Obama, I realized it was Obama riding Biden coat-tails all along. Biden was then the gifted orator it seems. Bill was lucky the economy did well I guess. I think Mick's shot in 2012 was also quite lopsided.
      • SV_BubbleTime 865 days ago
        > Hard to say. Considering that Biden got way more votes than Obama, I realized it was Obama riding Biden coat-tails all along.

        Can you please elaborate? I don’t remember anyone giving 1/2 a thought about Biden in 2008/2012. I am under such a different impression that I am left wondering if this was supposed to be sarcasm.

      • bellyfullofbac 865 days ago
        I think you're drawing the wrong conclusions from some numbers. Biden most likely got a lot of votes because of voter turnout, with his voters desperately wanting to get rid of Trump.
      • spfzero 866 days ago
        Are you talking about absolute vote count, or margin of victory? Obama's margin of victory in the electoral college was much greater in 2008 and 2012 vs. Biden's. Obama's popular vote margin was greater in 2008 and roughly equal in 2012, vs. Biden's.
  • dhosek 866 days ago
    This has been a week of discovering people I'd assumed were dead were still alive (although in this case, not so much anymore). The other one is Henry Kissinger whom I'd assumed had died decades ago but it turns out is still alive and putting his name on books.
    • seiferteric 866 days ago
      he was involved with theranos
      • toss1 865 days ago
        Probably more accurate to say 'fooled by Theranos'. I don't recall reading a single jot about his being part of the founding.
        • seiferteric 865 days ago
          He was on the board. It's their job to know what's going on, but they just didn't care to look or maybe know how. The people on the board were there for prestige rather than serving any real function unfortunately.
          • toss1 865 days ago
            Yup, sadly read of testimony of one of them that they weren't really sure why they were there (on the board). Of course, not all, indeed maybe most, board members are not technical experts. The board is there to set general corp strategy, not to do code review, and are generally working under the assumption that the executives are not lying to them; executives who are found to be lying to the board are generally rapidly dismissed.

            So, yes, I have a hard time blaming the board members who were used as much as the investors. I'm not sure there were ever any technically proficient board members, which also leads me to the conclusion that this was a planned fraud by Holmes, Balwani, etc.

  • beardedwizard 866 days ago
    Bob Dole doesn't need this :(
    • mrfox321 866 days ago
      Ladies and gentlemen, 73 year old candidate, Bob Dole!
  • MarkMc 865 days ago
    Bob Dole's passing has reminded me that one of the answers in the greatest crossword puzzle of all time was, "Bob Dole Elected". Worth a read: https://www.dailydot.com/unclick/clinton-1996-election-nyt-c...
  • skj 866 days ago
    Little known fact: "Bob Dole has died" were his last words.
    • mbg721 865 days ago
      For better or worse, the reputation for referring to himself in the third person is one he shares with Julius Caesar.
  • sjellen 865 days ago
    Read the first couple of chapters of “What it Takes” specifically the ones on Dole and then look at the current pool of politicians. You needn’t wonder why things are in a state of decline. The greatest hardship a modern politician has been through is losing a Twitter battle.
  • AlbertCory 866 days ago
    A great, great man. And one of the few Presidential candidates with a sense of humor [1]

    [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBklPt7oUOc starting at 11:00

    • queuebert 866 days ago
      Back when there were moderates who got along with each other and had a sense of humor. Glad we have a record of that.
  • sharmin123 866 days ago
    Guide on The Mental Health Effects Of Extramarital Affairs: https://www.hackerslist.co/guide-on-the-mental-health-effect...