A Portal Connecting NYC to Dublin Opens in Flatiron Today

(secretnyc.co)

103 points | by geox 11 days ago

24 comments

  • Aaronstotle 11 days ago
    This is neat, I hope one day similar structures are placed in cities around the globe, and it helps ease tension that builds so easily online.
    • janalsncm 11 days ago
      Seriously. Usually the only way we can see images of other places is through media, which may be biased. (Even if the stories are true, the stories which are chosen may not be representative.) This is a really cool opportunity to cut through all of that and just show everyday people.

      It would also be really cool if there was some kind of live translation that let people talk to each other in their native languages.

    • delfinom 11 days ago
      Yea...if it's countries with tensions, people will start mooning the portal and worse hahaha
      • jareklupinski 11 days ago
        > countries with tensions, people will start mooning the portal

        would make for a beautiful realisation

        "how petty our differences become, when we realize we all use the same butt"

      • anyfoo 11 days ago
        Well, I much prefer people mooning each other, or, similarly, the actual happenstance of countries voting for and against each other in the Eurovision Song Contest for reasons other than musical merit, to armed conflict.
      • chgs 11 days ago
        I believe there’s precedent for Americans mooning Austrailia.

        https://youtu.be/YkcVzNyj5sI?si=XXY3dnm8WPrmmbu0

      • Aaronstotle 11 days ago
        Americans & Brits making fun of each other through a portal would be pretty neat haha
  • janalsncm 11 days ago
    Super cool! I would love to see a ring of these leading to all different countries. Really interesting way to connect countries together.
    • anyfoo 11 days ago
      That would be fun. How do you imagine the “ring”? A huge part of the appeal is that both sides can see each other.
      • vundercind 11 days ago
        You could ask someone in Dublin to pass on a message, walk over to the portal coming from the “other side”, and maybe receive your message back from someone in Japan or something :-)
      • boopmaster 11 days ago
        Not the op, but I could imagine a series of portals in a circle formation at each site; maybe like 12 or 13 simulcast connections would be insane.
      • janalsncm 11 days ago
        My thought was a circle/semicircle with portals on the outside angled such that other portals are not in the backgrounds of the video.
  • cobertos 11 days ago
    SecretNYC (and all their secret sub brands, one per major city) always sussed me out a bit. They seem to just be blogs about events, but they also host their own, very templated events, like the Van Gogh immersive exhibits and the Candlelight Concerts (among others). They do this in every city and advertise the fuck out of them, which makes them seem more hollow when you see the scale of their enterprise from a 300ft view...
  • rqtwteye 11 days ago
    This is great. We should have many more of these. I am always surprised how different cities in other countries are when you travel there vs. what you see in the media. I really think this can bring people together.
  • ElijahLynn 11 days ago
    Does it do audio too?

    I wonder what the resolution and frame rate is too?

    Article was lacking technical detail.

    • futureshock 11 days ago
      We have one in Lublin, PL for the past several years. I’m not sure if ours will be moved or if they are building a new pair.

      There’s no audio. Webcam quality isn’t a pretty bad, maybe 720p with lots of compression artifacts. It’s not a 4k screen, reminds me of digital signage used for highway billboards.

      It’s still entertaining but every time I see it I long for 8k and a gigabit uplink.

  • walterbell 11 days ago
    Needs gesture recognition to trigger Stargate portal easter egg, https://youtube.com/watch?v=0WvN3Ji-xIQ

    Locations: https://www.portals.org/portals

  • crazygringo 11 days ago
    Why are none of the photos actually of Flatiron?

    (I don't know Dublin well enough to tell if any of them are of the Dublin side.)

    • futureshock 11 days ago
      It’s because the photos are of an existing Portal installation in Lublin, Poland and Vilnius, Lithuania. Lublin is my city and this thing has been running for a few years now. Everyone loves waving at it and seeing if anyone on the other side waves back. It’s quite silly but also rather touching.
    • lelandfe 11 days ago
      • crazygringo 10 days ago
        Thank you! Very cool, and good to see exactly where it's located.
    • anyfoo 11 days ago
      Presumably because they are of a previous location of the art’s installation. The article is written in future tense, so it stands to reason that there are no (interesting) pictures of the new installation yet.
    • dylan604 11 days ago
      "A sculpture known as The Portal is heading to NYC’s Flatiron neighborhood"

      Seems you might be thinking of a specific building instead

    • NoboruWataya 11 days ago
      > (I don't know Dublin well enough to tell if any of them are of the Dublin side.)

      Doesn't look like it.

  • mikeocool 11 days ago
    An artist set something similar up between NYC and London in 2008 — was always fun to walk by.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/21/arts/design/21tele.html

  • JumpCrisscross 11 days ago
    Reminds me of the Shared Studios containers, except those have audio [1]. Funnily enough, that also started as a project called Portal (between New York and Tehran) [2].

    [1] https://www.sharedstudios.com/

    [2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portals_(initiative)

  • initramfs 11 days ago
    What we really need is to have people on both sides of the pond dress up as green men from outer space and wave to each other with three webbed digits.
  • Nihilartikel 11 days ago
    I wonder when we'll have light field capturing and emitting surfaces that would make it look like a real hole between places...
  • esafak 11 days ago
  • extheat 11 days ago
    Cool stuff. It's kind of interesting because the time zones are several hours off, so I wonder how well it works at night. From the renders I see the quality doesn't seem that great (for better or worse), still quite fascinating to look through I'm sure.
  • notnaut 11 days ago
    I walk by this location regularly. VERY open to goofy ideas and harmless shenanigans.
  • dan-g 11 days ago
    Awesome! There’s a really cool company in Japan doing something similar for enterprise: https://tonari.no/en
  • IncreasePosts 11 days ago
    I wonder what the latency is going to be on this. It needs to be at least 1/30th of a second round trip but I suspect the actual latency is going to be more like 1s+
    • crazygringo 11 days ago
      I don't know why it would be any different from a Zoom call.

      In reality it's probably even faster since neither side is dealing with Wi-Fi.

      • bagels 11 days ago
        It doesn't say what technology is used, does it? Could be using wifi, or cell networks.
        • pclmulqdq 11 days ago
          Wired, using the subsea fiber cables, your still stuck at a 60 ms RTT minimum from NYC to Dublin. Add in video transcoding time and a more realistic estimate of the networks on either side, and you're looking at latency closer to 200-400 ms. WiFi over this distance actually isn't a significant contributor to latency.
          • oceanplexian 11 days ago
            Actually transcoding can be done far below that with consumer hardware. I’m doing Quicksync accelerated transcoding right now for Moonlight and encoding/decoding latency is only a few ms. And Wifi is, by far the greatest source of latency. In fact I can get data to a datacenter a few hundred km away over a fiber connection faster than Wifi across the room (<5ms vs 10-20ms)
            • pclmulqdq 11 days ago
              A few hundred km and 5000-7000 km under the ocean are very different. Good to know transcoding can be so fast, though.

              Dublin is about 10-50 times further from NY than you are from that datacenter, and the speed of light is a universal limit.

          • bagels 11 days ago
            Where does it say it's using a wired connection? Agree that the latency from the distance is going to be a big factor.
    • chgs 11 days ago
      Why 1/30th?

      Latency will be far more than that due to speed of light.

      My mpeg vision circuits are about 480ms end to end from Washington/New York to London. The j2k ones are faster but still in the 200ms range. In theory you could get it down to sub 100ms but at that point you are certainly having to engineer your paths correctly and use barely any compression.

      Uncompressed 4k is in the 10gbit range. My uhd jxs bitrates are about 1.3gbit but wouldn’t deliver sub 200 across the pond.

      • anyfoo 11 days ago
        OP is correct, 1/30 s is a good ballpark theoretical lower bound.

        Assuming travel across the earth surface, light in a vacuum take about 14ms to cross the distances. Times two for round trip that’s about 1/30 s.

        Of course we don’t have anywhere near ideal conditions there (at a minimum, light in fiber is already slower, closer to 40ms round trip in that case, and of course network infrastructure adds orders of magnitude), but it’s a good limit.

        • oceanplexian 11 days ago
          You don’t need round trip with live video, you can push frames in UDP packets from both sides.
          • IncreasePosts 11 days ago
            I was thinking more about the rtt to do something in new york and see the reaction of the person in Dublin, which would probably be the major indicator of latency.
      • mysecretaccount 11 days ago
        > Why 1/30th? > Latency will be far more than that due to speed of light.

        1/30th of 1s is almost exactly the round-trip time from NYC to Dublin (Wolfram Alpha says 17ms one-way).

    • trey-jones 11 days ago
      I wonder the same. I already take issue with the use of "realtime" in the marketing material.
      • anyfoo 11 days ago
        Realtime means different things in different contexts. If I can watch a webcam of freeway traffic, than 5 seconds delay is, for all intents and purposes, realtime.

        If we talk about medical equipment, it may be very different based on the equipment.

        Real time OSs advertise maximum guaranteed latencies. 0 latency does not exist in the physical world, the speed of light can’t be convinced to hurry up, unfortunately.

      • Chilko 11 days ago
        Would you consider zoom call with someone on the other side of an ocean "realtime"?

        If so, I don't see how this is any different. If not, that's a pretty narrow definition of realtime given the context.

    • futureshock 11 days ago
      Imagine a transatlantic Zoom call off your laptop camera and home wifi. Not great. I have seen this Portal in person.
  • xracy 11 days ago
    I wonder how long it will be before we realize we can't have nice things.

    In the meantime, this seems cool!

  • hderms 11 days ago
    is Dublin becoming more of a cultural center since Brexit?
    • a_paddy 11 days ago
      Brexit? The British left Dublin 102 years ago.
      • chgs 11 days ago
        As in since the U.K. shot itself in the foot more effort is being spent on an English speaking country in Europe at the expense of an English speaking country in its own.
    • wk_end 11 days ago
      Ehhh I wouldn’t think it’d make a significant difference on its own. London is what it is (was what it was?) because of centuries of English imperial hegemony, not just because it’s English-speaking. Berliners speak the global lingua franca virtually just as well and - with no slight intended to the Irish - their city is a much more natural fit as the new European cosmopolitan cultural Mecca.

      Dublin’s rising global prominence probably has more to do with Ireland’s rather business-friendly taxation policies.

  • _dain_ 11 days ago
    there are portals ...
  • chahex 11 days ago
    I hope this helps manifest a real portal but yeah JetBlue may disagree (i.e. unmanifest)
  • einpoklum 11 days ago
    [flagged]
    • anyfoo 11 days ago
      Well, yes, but you didn’t, did you.

      Come on, it does not take long consideration to appreciate how this can be interesting, even if the technical requirements aren’t interesting in themselves.

  • bagels 11 days ago
    Is Facebook going to complain about trademarks?